> > From: jonesr@gatwick.geco-prakla.slb.com
>
> > > > From: jonesr@gatwick.geco-prakla.slb.com
> > > > Whereas, if you're high on pot, there is an increased probability,
> > > > compared to all other road users, that you're going to have an accident.
>
> > > *Exactly* how much of an increase?
>
> > I don't know.
>
> I rest my case.
You've said that before, and you didn't.
I notice that you have deleted the bit where I asked you whether you
knew the statistical increase in danger for drink drivers. I can only,
therefore, assume that you *do not* know the statistics, and you do accept
that drink driving is dangerous.
>
> > > Are you guessing again, or do you
> > > actually have that statistic?
>
> His answer: No!
And your answer to the question about drink driving: *No!*
> > And you havn't offered any evidence to prove that being stoned is a
> > safe condition to drive it. You've merely stated it again and again and
> > again, and I'll disagree with you every time until you give /me/ evidence.
>
> Translation: Jonesr can never come up with any evidence. I have always
> stated mine.
Your evidence being the absolute refusal to accept anyone else's point of
view other than your own. Well, I'm convinced....Not!
>
> > > All you have is
> > > your one lonely experience....a very lonely experience.
>
> > Again, I'm sorry not to live up to your expectations, but I've never
> > personally experienced it, it was a friend of mine.
>
> But it doesn't change a thing. It is still one very lonely
> experience.
Yes, but the initial intent on your part was to offend, and belittle. You
fail once again, XYZ ... go home.
Drakir
-------------
Richard Jones
jonesr@gatwick.geco-prakla.slb.com
-------------
"We are the New Breed,
We are the Future."
-------------